In addition, it is not always necessary for acceptance to take the form of a signature on a sheet of paper, although this is the most commonly accepted agreement between the parties. For example, if a party performs an act that would not happen otherwise, such as a painter. B who paints a home or a professional moving business that moves furniture from one place to another, this would be interpreted as an acceptance and consent to the terms of the offer to pay for these services. Offers can really cover anything from an oral agreement on the provision of a service, such as Housesitting, to a detailed contract with legal terminology that can be found in a real estate transfer agreement. This is more than a promise, because we must understand that what is agreed will be legally binding. It can be made for the sale of goods, a promise to fulfill a service, or even a promise not to engage in an activity. The more complex the agreement, the more likely it is that each party will hire a lawyer to negotiate the contract. “Acceptance means the importance of the bidder`s willingness to enter into a contract with the bidder on the terms it offers. Without adoption, there can be no contract…. The letter of acceptance and its acceptance by the bidder constitute the formation of a contract that binds the employer and the bidder until the formal contract is signed. Acceptance is an act or an implication that allows the acceptance of an offer that then forms a binding contract. From a legal point of view, if a person accepts an offer, he or she agrees to comply with the proposed conditions. Acceptance can be used in a number of situations such as: for the assumption, the essential requirement is that the parties have been involved, from a subjective perspective, in behaviours expressing their agreement. After this session of the theory of the spirit of the treaty, a party was able to resist a claim of violation by demonstrating that it did not intend to be bound by the agreement, only if it seemed subjective that it intended to do so.
This is not satisfactory because one party does not have the opportunity to know the undisclosed intentions of another party. One party can only act on the basis of what the other party objectively reveals (Lucy V Zehmer, 196 Va 493 84 S.E. 2d 516) to be its intention. Therefore, a real meeting of minds is not necessary. In fact, it has been argued that the idea of “meeting minds” is a very modern mistake: the judges of the 19th century spoke of the “ad idem consensus” that modern teachers wrongly translated into “meeting spirits”, but which in fact means “agreement with the same cause”.  Acceptance is made when something is received by another with the intention of retaining it and shows that the offer was made in a previous agreement. You can accept something either orally or in writing, depending on what is detailed in the contract. If it is a written offer, it can only be accepted officially in writing.
The Sale of Purchase Act defines the different ways in which acceptance can be considered done. A buyer is considered presumed: the finding that there was indeed a “meeting of spirits” is however difficult and is no longer the only criterion used by a court to determine the validity of a contract. Factors such as behaviour and consent indicate the intention to conclude the agreement and predominate over the criteria of “satisfaction of minds”. An invitation to treatment is not an offer, but an indication of a person`s willingness to negotiate a contract.